Showing posts with label LoRa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LoRa. Show all posts

Monday, February 14, 2022

The first illegal satellite launch in history

Normally when I read about LoRa, I am reading a story about IoT devices in a smart-home installation, and always in the future-tense. As of late a few LoRa devices have made it to market, mostly bleeding edge makes of dubious origin. Choovio, for example, has a door sensor and a leak sensor. They don't have a thermostat, but a temperature sensor. There are a few makes of water meters out there as well. There's a selection of even more anonymous brand LoRa devices shipping directly from China on Alibaba.com.

LoRa is a real radio protocol, but it's application is still mostly hypothetical until a major brand releases a fully supported, and more commercially viable home device. It needs to be robust, something you might touch every day: a thermostat, light switch or dimmer. Despite all the marketing noise, we are just not there yet. I'll get into the vices and virtues of that radio protocol some other time. More here.

So in that void, the most notable LoRa radio story to date was a one-of-a-kind crime committed by the company Swarm Technologies Inc... which is owned by SpaceX. (Yeah... that guy.) It was the first illegal satellite launch in history. In fairness, Warm was only bought out by SpaceX in August 2021. This they did on their own.  On April 26th 2017, Swarm Technologies applied to the FCC for permission to deploy an experimental radio service license for its initial "picosatellites." 

Those picosatellites are  just what they sound like, little tiny satellites. These confirm to the 0.25U CubeSat form factor. That is often described as about the size of a grilled cheese sandwich: 11 x 11 x 2.8 cm, weighing only 400 grams. Starlinks' already "tiny" satellites are about 260 Kg. 

Getting back to the felons. Swarm Technologies filed for a license in the Experimental Radio Service, under Part 5 of the FCC’s rules to deploy and operate four SpaceBEEs (Basic Electronic Elements) and two earth stations. [LINK] On December 12, 2017 the FCC said no, a hard "NO" on that application. They were concerned about swarms ability to track the satellites. 

On January 8th, 2018, Swarm Technologies filed a second application for authorization to launch and operate a different set of satellites that were a more conventional small satellite size. That second application was still pending when on January 12th through the 21st of 2018, Swarm Technologies launched the original four SpaceBEEs. (This, by the way, is a terrible idea. When the FCC says no, they are quite willing to back that up.) More here.

With some irony, the FCC, wholly unaware of that January launch, granted Swarm Technologies’ second application on February 5, 2018. But by them Swarm had 4 illegally orbiting picosatellites already transmitting to and received transmissions from their two Georgia-based earth stations. 

On March 5th 2018 The FCC learned about the unauthorized launch and began an investigation. During that investigation they discovered that Swarm Technologies had also illegally performed unauthorized weather balloon-to-ground station tests, including to and from moving vehicles. 

All-in-all the FCC went light on them. No one was criminally charged. The consent decree even lightly praised Swarm Technologies for obeying the law during the course of the investigation. A convoluted wad of verbage which can only be attributed to a radical libertarian like Ajit Pai. Nonetheless the fine was a notable $900,000. This is not a record fine by any measure. The record by the way is 225 million, by comparison this was a swat on the wrist. Swarm Technologies was even permitted to continue operating the network afterward. The event, as a whole, remains a testament to the sense of entitlement and bravado commonplace among techbros.

Wednesday, October 28, 2015

LPWAN for M2M

The phrase "the Internet of things" just irritates me. I don't want my washing machine to wirelessly connect to my laptop. I don't need my TV to report data to my printer, cellphone or my sump pump. I don't need to wirelessly cam my cat while I'm at work, and my hot water heater and my deep freezer do not need to be friends. I don't need a personal drone to deliver used books to my doorstep. I can wait a few days for USPS. I even find the relatively inoffensive Fitbit somewhat dubious. But as a radio geek you knwo I'm no Luddite. I just have no use for bells and whistles that increase the cost of goods. Ex. car back up cameras. I have three mirrors and a neck. I can just turn and look. No thank you.

But it's coming anyway. The obstacles to the great wireless everything have mostly been in the realm of physics: battery life and signal distance.  Then there is one legal one: signal strength. If your output exceeds a certain amplitude, which varies by band, then your device requires a nod from the FCC. All three of these obstacles have been conquered in the last year by a set of technologies collectively called LPWAN - Low-Power Wide Area Networks. It's one answer for what's called M2M, Machine-to-Machine communications. (M2M is also a terrible Norwegian pop duo) There is a lot of money on the table now, so the VC articles are coming out in force: here, here, and here.

Bluetooth for example is very power efficient, but only has about a 30ft range because the output power is very low, 3 watts at the maximum. A cell tower can operates at 1000 watts but your cell phone operates at about 3 watts but consumes much more power as you can tell by how often you have to charge it. (Mine is daily but that's diminished by MDM software.) Zigbee (the open, global wireless standard) is only good to about 60 feet.  The scale of this technical problem grows with the number of devices we try to connect. How big will that be?  In 2012 Cisco has claimed there would be 50 billion devices online by 2020.  Brett Swanson at Computerworld echoed that comment just a month ago:
"As the world becomes saturated with 7 billion or so mobile phones, however, the immersive Internet will multiply that total several times over. In the next decade, we might connect 50 billion or so devices to the Internet — every car, watch, boat, shoe, package, shipping container, medical device, vending machine, camera, drone, you name it."

So radio engineers have been hard at work on a solution. Computer World even recently referred to the existing technologies as "unapologetically slow." Numerous brands have worked out their own solutions: LoRaWAN, Semtech, Sigfox, and Ingenu. The goal is not to make the data move faster but to make the range further and the technology cheaper. It doesn't matter how LPWAN gets there and there are already multiple solutions on the market that all use unlicensed wireless spectrum burned into a silicon chip. It's that affordability that will make it ubiquitous.